[Webinar held in October] Basics of thinking about antitrust law violation risk that can arise due to new social conditions
There are already widespread warnings about cartel risks with regards to so-called sensitive information such as prices, volumes and trading partners.
On the other hand, collaborative efforts among businesses may be spontaneously formed to create new social values. There are also occasions when coordinated efforts are required to respond to new changes in social conditions.
From the perspective of antitrust law and pro-competition, it is probably assumed that this should not be considered problematic.
However, it is important to note that coordinating business activities conducted by "each company on its own" poses cartel risks even if the matters are not related to sensitive information.
In this seminar, we will move away from the concept of "the object of the act" (i.e., caution in handling sensitive information), and rethink cartel risk from the idea of "the mode of the act" (i.e., caution in consideration of coordination and alignment).
Clues can be found in everyday business documents. In this seminar, we will review the basics of antitrust law by focusing on "everyday business documents" that were considered critical evidence in actual cases, as well as the concrete image that abstract legal theories are trying to convey.
◆Title: Basics of thinking about antitrust law violation risk that can arise due to new social conditions
◆Date: Wednesday October 2021, 10 @ 27:15-00:16 (JST)
◆ Webinar type: Zoom Webinar
Partner Lawyer / Antitrust Practice Group Leader
2001 Registered as a lawyer in New York, USA / February 2016 - March 2 Member of the Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) study group on a prospective JFTC discretionary surcharge (or, fining) system. In addition, since 2017, he has been a lecturer at Ritsumeikan University Law School (Antitrust Law) / since July 3, he has been a executive board member and secretary general of the Japan Competition Law Forum.
Publications: Series "The Key Evidence of Antitrust Violation" (#14-#2020) Japan Business Law Review (January 1 to April 2021), "Key Considerations for Lawyers and Companies in Preparation for the Upcoming Implementation of the Act for Amendment of the Antimonopoly Act" Fair Trade No. 4, p. 839 (September 2020) et al.
As a group of specialists who provide high-quality legal services, Momo-O, Matsuo, and Namba Law Offices accurately and promptly respond to the diverse needs of clients in global corporate activities.Our lawyers have a high degree of expertise in legal affairs in all fields such as litigation / arbitration, corporate law, antitrust law, M & A, business revitalization, labor law, intellectual property rights, and compliance. We offer.For international projects (public relations projects), we provide legal services on a global basis using Interlaw's international network, regardless of inbound (Japanese business of foreign companies) or outbound (overseas business of Japanese companies). , Support the client properly.
Articles in the same category
[5/31 15th Fraud Countermeasures Study Session] [Must-see for compliance personnel] Mass media response in the event of a crisis
[Online seminar held on 5/9] New framework and practical outlook for European foreign investment regulations - Explanation of the European Commission's new regulation proposal and the regulatory environment of major countries -
[Real seminar held on 4/18] “Crisis management proposed by a competition law/consumer law boutique firm” ~Risk management to avoid a “crisis”~
Exploring patient stratification biomarkers for IgA nephropathy using AI: Overcoming bias with AI
Searching for therapeutic targets for pancreatic cancer - I tried using paper search AI -
Parkinson's disease - Analyzing drug discovery targets using paper search AI
Economic Security Symposium co-hosted by FRONTEO x Moody's Analytics Japan on April 4th
Searching for new targets for sporadic ALS using AI: Become friends with AI
[Webinar held on 3/25] Risk of important information leakage of Japanese companies due to cross-border application of discovery and its response